DNA, the ‘Word of God’, and the Cosmic Embodied Human

'Junk' DNA may be what governs the subtle ‘quantum’ level of our physicality

Junk??? How can ‘junk’ possibly run the quantum realm, one wonders.

Alright, the genome people have stepped away somewhat from the term ‘junk’, replacing it with all sorts of scientific words to say that the ‘junk’ does fulfill some kind of function. But ‘junk’ is persistent, after all it is easier to remember for us ordinary mortals than ‘introns’ and ‘transposons’, and the function of such things remains uncertain even to the genome people.

A further layer of wonderment arises when considering that the ‘junk’ makes up 98% (or more) of our DNA… Only 2% (maximum) actually do the coding for proteins and amino-acids. Why would elegantly purposeful Mother Nature have us carry such a huge amount of useless stuff? By the way, and to make a finer but more striking point, ’junk DNA’ is ‘garbage DNA’ in Russian.

Yes, this is another ‘Russian post’, but today we visit cutting-edge science.

Enter Pyotr Gariayev and his tremendous work on what he calls Kod Boga, ‘the Code of God’ (title of one of his books). He says that the ‘junk/garbage’ holds the ‘strategic information about how our chromosomes work’, ‘quantum information requested and received by DNA molecules acting as antennae from the cosmos’. Yikes. That’s some pretty powerful garbage! ‘Coding for proteins is not only a biochemical process, rather a quasi-rational activity’ (emphasis mine). It’s all about us communicating with the universe, and the universe communicating with us. Such mutual interpenetration is a matter of fields, including the very important ones called ‘spin fields’ or ‘torsion fields’ where photons get busy.

Gariayev (recently deceased, ‘surprisingly’ at a relatively young age for a scientist at the peak of his expertise) is undoubtedly one of ‘those genius Russians’… Western geneticists are variably aware of his work but most tend to carefully ignore it, for it seriously challenges their prevailing dogma. The broader western public is altogether unaware of it, even as increasingly the acronym ‘DNA’ is more or less magically invoked by everyone and their dog - as if people knew anything about it beyond computer images of the double helix. Yet the ‘magical invocation’ is not altogether groundless, as we shall see.

Gariayev impeccably acknowledges and quotes earlier Russian geneticists who paved the way for him with sometimes ‘mystical’ notions about DNA being more than what codes for proteins. Based on Gariayev’s research, he and his team have developed real therapies that actually work, based not on genetic engineering (that he calls a tragic mistake - I think we know enough by now to agree with him) but on what is termed the ‘wave-linguistic’ nature of the genome. This phrase in Russian, which would literally translate as ‘linguistic-wavy’, might work better in English if we take it to mean ‘vibrational-linguistic’ (this being my educated guess as a layperson).

Regarding the linguistic aspect, Gariayev contends that chromosomes carry a semantically meaningful charge. This is no trivial statement! The semantically meaningful charge differentiates what makes a human rather than a dog or a frog, considering that all living beings on Earth have more or less the same basic physical stock of genes, numbering some 35 000 (and that less complex species can have many more genes than humans). The differentiation is more readily understood if the whole DNA - including its large amount of ‘garbage’ - operates as a truly linguistic structure. This complex structure astonishingly uses the ‘letters’ of DNA in ‘synonymy’ that generates redundancy in coding, as well as in ‘homonymy’ that involves a choice of this or that expression of the gene, depending on the broader contextual needs of the living human.

The wave/vibrational aspect operates as a kind of subtle ‘music’, the vibrational nature of harmonious sound. DNA is not only biochemical coding for proteins, which is what western geneticists work with. Gariayev explains that these coding genes have their larger ‘double’ or equivalent in the field - at the subtle quantum level - of which the biochemical aspect is the end-product constantly monitored and modulated by the field with its ‘garbage’.

The ‘music’ is of course vibrational, but so are photons, the super-weak radiation of chromosomes that has laser-like coherence. Photons are also polarized, whereby their informational potential is related to their quantum-level condition of ‘spin’ or ‘torsion’.

Gariayev’s findings are revolutionary beyond those of western-trained geneticists. He regrets that the latter still operate mainly with the purely biochemical substance of DNA, and mostly ignore the potential of the larger quantum field component.

Everything changes when DNA is considered as a whole comprising both substances and fields that work with electro-magnetics, sound and torsion, as well as emit hyper-weak photonic ‘laser’ that ‘reads’ the condition of innumerable cells of the body towards making regulatory ‘decisions’. When we laypeople magically invoke the power of ‘DNA’ we are probably unknowingly reflecting a subconscious awareness that it is much more than the physical thing of genomics.

Much more than we suspect. Gariayev’s scientific considerations lead to an unexpected but very congruent place - unexpected for modern science, congruent for the mystically inclined (note that these two aspects, mostly antithetical in western science, seem to be natural partners in many a Russian scientist).

I was mightily relieved to read Gariayev’s spontaneously ‘spiritual’ understanding of DNA based on his scientific findings. The non-scientific version of it had already come to me in contemplative practice - a notion so obvious yet so mind-bending that I was split between acceptance and denial. I had been bothered for quite a while by the commonly accepted acronym ‘DNA’ that has acquired the status of a word - a magic word capable of somehow encapsulating our complex human reality. I was bothered by the magic power bestowed to a chemical word, ‘deoxyribonucleic acid’, to reduce the complexity that makes us human to nothing more than just an acid. Well, what came to me in contemplation was that the magic acronym is a scientifically reductive term for nothing less than what is contained in the ancient Greek term ‘Logos’! The acronym is scientific word-spell to reduce a huge reality to an (albeit tremendous) biochemical thing itself reduced to an ‘acid’.

Gradually I began to invoke Logos in contemplative practice, tentatively as it felt like forbidden territory. But my body and its field responded to it, in tiny subtle ways - sudden gentle heat in hand and feet, a softly relaxed sense of quickening in other places, a barely perceptible activation of ‘something’ in the field…

Gariayev connects the linguistic aspect of DNA back to the famous religious concept, ‘word of god’, or Logos. He does not dwell on this huge statement, for his mission is that of his advanced genomics field, and the Logos connection is self-evident to him. But I should dwell on it a little.

Logos understood as a ‘divine’ word is of course far larger than any ordinary word. It denotes a creative and re-creative principle. In the understanding that the physical-and-subtle DNA as a whole operates like a hyper-complex ‘primordial’ language beyond language, DNA as Logos is logically more than our limited, unduly literal (‘god uttered the word’), religious sense of ‘the word’. The Britannica encyclopedia correctly reminds us that ‘the Stoic philosophers in the 4th–3rd century BCE defined the logos as an active rational and spiritual principle that permeated all reality’ (emphasis mine).

The Logos being an organizing and harmonizing great principle, its understanding as ‘word’ is actually a derivative meaning, an encapsulation that has unfortunately displaced that greater original meaning, muddying the waters of our holistic spiritual-and-physical sense of ourselves and of everything.

Furthermore, this principle operates across all living beings, giving a deeper meaning to the Biblical reference to a single original language ‘spoken’ all over Earth. It points to deeper levels of subtle mutual understanding, between humans and with other species in the remote ‘telepathic’ past, and still residually operating in certain indigenous cultures.

[This is a very simplified summary of the core argument in Gariayev’s book ‘Code of God’. That argument, from a scientific standpoint, seems to converge with what I have called the Human as ‘cosmic being’.]