EctoLife - the sick love of the godtrix for… the matrix!
Seeking your participation in Techno-mind’s wet dream
If you have not yet seen the video of the EctoLife project - horror gift-wrapped in enticement - perhaps you would like to check it out before reading further.
The enticement for (initially) frustrated or fearful would-be parents is stated in the subtitle - eliminates pregnancy and labor. The horror is the whole video, with its astonishingly blunt A.I.-mechanistic imagery. Both aspects are packaged in the ideology of ‘convenience and comfort’, possibly the most successful soft deceit of all godtrix in our modern era.
or https://www.brighteon.com/f9868b81-17cb-4564-b84a-c3d5937112dd
The ‘matrix’ here is a baby farm or factory - literally. Papa and Mama simply deliver the products of their respective gonads, after which they are provided with all sorts of tech to ‘take part’ in a precision-industrial process of gestation and birth.
That ‘matrix’, provided by the ‘godtrix’, is a full techno-bio package made appealing by assurances of convenience-safety-choice-comfort for women. A number of women may well like the prospect - those whose womanhood, gutted in this modern era, has lost awareness of the true natural version of matrix=womb.
Godtrix is genius-level clever business. Nowadays it likes to show off openly. The EctoLife video has the hubris-laden merit of providing ‘revelation of the method’, for anyone who has eyes to really see, eyes connected to a functioning human mind and heart - and a Human soul.
The video makes one key point implicitly clear - its dystopia requires the willing participation of humans. Our demise as ‘human 1.0’ requires our more or less conscious acceptance of our demise, and explicitly our agreement to participate (with real human sperm and ova) in the techno-manufacturing of the post-human. Whatever ‘free will’ we might possess must be secured by the godtrix, albeit through its warping of truth, to appear compliant with this law of the universe.
Of course, the contentious point is that our free choice is handicapped by trickery producing un-informed consent, in this EctoLife project as in everything else. Here, for instance, one wonders what substances are mixed into the nutrients for the fetus, what secret CRISPR interventions modify the DNA, what unsuspected trauma is caused by deliberate change of parameters in the ‘amniotic fluid’ or tweaks to electric signals… or even by power or mechanical failures that occur in any kind of automated industrial plant.
One wonders whether the universe has been learning a thing or two about its law of free will. No offense intended, but it has been allowing no small amount of distortion of what ‘free’ means. Earthly goings-on over the past millennia, and their accelerated intensification since the early twentieth century, must have been for the universe a frightfully painful lesson in the warping of ‘free will’.
Deceitful krivda has us modern people, and increasingly also the ‘less advanced’ people of the ‘developing world’, trapped in all the crookedness of systems - from money, health, food, work to spirituality - of an inhuman-inhumane empire. Historically, the deceit has been enforced by violence at all levels, physical, emotional, cognitive, spiritual (dot-connected in Krivda as much as was possible within a single book). The great refinement of the modern age has been to make the violence ‘look good’ through the gift-wrap of convenience, consumerism, comfort, entitlement, ‘progressive’ ideology. These in turn are further embedded in falsified systems under benign names - ‘rule of law’, ‘rights’, ‘democratic’ institutions, ‘dependable’ authorities, ‘equal’ opportunity, ‘safety’, health ‘care’, ‘education’, and so on.
All that complicated construct, along with its internalized violent substratum, makes for our efficient mind-programming with powerful occult pathogens that drive much of our psyche to self-diminish and self-destruct what it is to be human. ‘Human 1.0’ has a severe dissociation disorder.
This elaborate construct has been showing its true colors openly over the past few years. Those of us who simply cannot face the reality of their own internal dissociation must absolutely uphold their faith in convenience, entitlement, comfort, progressive ideology managed by unquestioned authorities.
Hence it is to be expected that a number of women (and their compassionate men) would love to ‘have’ a child conveniently and comfortably, ’without pregnancy and labor’. So many women (and men) do not realize how relentlessly the krivda system has broken human bodies, especially of females, in the recent centuries and decades, under cover of women’s aspirations for career, income, gender equality, markers of visible ‘success’. So many remain painfully unaware of the loss of the natural-and-spiritual womb in a life-hating anti-culture.
Once upon a time, there was a ‘god’ who decreed that women would give birth in pain. Such a deeply imprinted ‘divine law’ in the western female psyche (courtesy of Christian religion) has only marginally been mitigated by some very recent pain-killing arrangements of modern obstetrics. The latter being a medical specialty, historically dominated by men, that largely grew out of the brutal eradication of an age-old non-medical life-reality of traditional midwifery.
In godly logic, the solution to fully reverse inescapable maternal suffering decreed by ‘god’ would have to come from, well… another ‘god’. While many Christians live in the anxious expectation of an anti-Christ, this other ‘god’ is already right here. The Techno-mind god, as I call it, can undo that earlier divine decree with the magic wand of tech - the direct way for it to do away altogether with the messy organic-spiritual business of gestating and laboring human mothers.
It’s not about generously reversing all the poisoning, programming, fragmenting, commodifying, that has turned women into fearful owners of deficient wombs. It’s about enthroning a new top-god that has been orchestrating for this moment to arise, and to acquire the top-godly status of a (false) ‘Creator of life’ .
With machines. Sophisticated womb-machinery, equipped with A.I., CRISPR, Augmented Reality devices, precision measurement tools, exact formulae for temperature and nutrients in the techno-amniotic pod, bio-machine interfaces, and probably also technologies of which we have no idea, but which have been brewing in secret labs for decades.
Oh, but we note that for some not-so-strange reason, Techno-mind the false Creator can’t provide the egg and sperm anymore than it can create seeds of plants. This remains the most important detail - Techno-mind isn’t a creator god any more than the earlier one who cast the spell of pain on laboring women. But both those gods have an obsession with getting humans to believe in them as The Creator - including of us humans.
Their great godly mission is to erase out of reality humans’ intrinsically creative nature - our human nature that, significantly, does not require us to be gods.
The video is not sci-fi. It presents itself as the description of something real, not yet fully built-out, but very feasible within ten or fifteen years. It projects the very techno-scientific kind of certainty that befits a Techno-mind god.
The video is so blatantly tech-worshipping, and so impeccably false in its convenience-comfort discourse (female voice of course) accompanying every aspect of the process, that one has to wonder: was it made as a deliberate provocation? Is it an implicit warning about an impending post-human reality? Does it aim to shock viewers out of passive, mindless ‘convenience’?
A (male) contributor to newatlas.com has this to say about the video:
‘I find this concept pretty twisted, inhuman and dystopian. But given the Matrix-reminiscent layout of the EctoLife facility … one gets the impression Al-Ghalil wants to provoke strong reactions.
And at the end of the day… I’ve got two kids that I feel very connected with and close to, and I didn't have to go through pregnancy or labor; I left that bit to my wife. So I'm hardly in a position to criticize the idea.’ (italics mine).’ (https://newatlas.com/medical/ectolife-artifical-womb-facility/)
In other words, a well-meaning man who presumably cares for his wife’s well-being, is imprinted with the prevalent belief that pregnancy and labor must be an ordeal, and is thus ‘not in a position’ to distrust a project that would hand over the most fundamentally natural creativity of a human couple to the machine-realm. I like to imagine that his wife would ‘be in a position’ to squirm very energetically at the ‘Matrix-reminiscent layout’…
We the women of modernity have no memory of how our ancestors managed and experienced pregnancy and labor, and are ignorant of anthropological observation of sane ‘primitive’ cultures in which laboring mothers tended to fare pretty well. Thanks to ‘religion’ and the medicalized standardization of the most naturally cosmic act of human manifestation, not many of us experience this act beyond the (unsavory) physical. And for most modern men, it is even less of a cosmic event. Women of the ‘third world’ being increasingly pulled into their (more brutal) version of ‘modernity’, are also fast losing the memory and cosmic dimension.
One of the most awfully remarkable achievements of the godtrix is to have installed deep into women's psyche a fear of their own body, of their own nature, and of the divinely-decreed pain. Arguably, the birthing mother will unwittingly make herself experience excruciating pain because it is solidly programmed into her subconscious.
The EctoLife video - a conspicuously trans-humanist cherry on the Techno-mind cake - has tremendous shock-power to make us ask ourselves seriously whether we agree henceforth to let our species be farmed/factory produced; to make us contemplate the future of our (or rather, its) post-human babies - predictably involving further formatting with post-human ‘education’, ‘morals’, ‘health’, ‘productivity’, ‘sustainability’, and other such categories of, actually, ‘slavery’.
Now let us consider this from the human side of the ‘Great Whatever’.
Countless initiatives, large and small, very public or under the radar, are working to take back from Techno-mind what it has stolen and now blatantly strives to take away from us forever. It isn’t hard to find activists and trail-blazers showing how to resist and thrive in the fields of health, money, community, farming, education, law, and lots more. The resistance already has its ‘celebrities’ with large followings.
Yet on the topic of bringing forth new human lives in a truly human way, the resistance is discreet in comparison. Perhaps because the topic is still largely a ‘women’s thing’, in which women are more or less silently helpless, and men are much less invested than in fields where they can be vocal and proactive. Perhaps because a long period of patriarchy has distorted ‘fatherhood’ no less than ‘motherhood’. But also because human procreation is so much more complex than ‘bodies reproducing the species’. In its ungraspable complexity, in its intimacy with the traumatized core of women’s greater being-ness, it is also hard to put in words - the old midwives themselves did not produce mountains of theory, they just knew, inter-generationally.
But that resistance is as real as it is discreet. I am aware of it in parts of Europe starting about forty years ago. In America, Jeanice Barcelo is a bravely sensitive pioneer - if you do not know about her work, you might want to visit https://birthofanewearth.com.
You might agree that the matter of ‘procreative authenticity and sovereignty’ is no less fundamental and urgent than those of health and food sovereignty, if we are to retain - or rather fully restore - our humanity, and enable the live continuity of the Great Human Journey in the new generations. In this larger perspective, it concerns all of us, whether male or female, wanting a child or not, old or new parent, and across dividing lines of any sort. Within the collective oversoul of humanity, what is at stake belongs to all of us.
In that perspective, the video brings up profound questions, at the intersection of the physical and the intangible. For instance:
Without gestation in the natural womb, what would parent-child bonding look like? At best, it would presumably resemble the patterns experienced in cases of adoption. But unlike adopted children of the ‘human 1.0’ version, EctoLife children would likely have artificial genetic and epigenetic imprinting to make a normal parent-child relationship difficult - the better to suit the post-human agenda. They might internally know themselves to be the children of no one, or might even be ‘children of the state/corporation’ - eerily reminiscent of so many orphans across the centuries, who were chattel, property, guinea-pigs of slave-owners, factories, institutions. They might be imprinted with MKUltra kinds of programming.
Little attention is given to the notion that in a sane culture the pregnant mother’s soul nurtures the soul, not ‘just the body’, of the new being in her womb. Would EctoLife babies have a human soul, or a non-human/less than human soul? If the only authentically human ‘ingredient’ in such new beings is sperm and ovum, without the natural-spiritual journey inside a human womb, does the embryo still grow into the expression of a soul?
What we call DNA was a big thing for certain old gods, and genetic ‘engineering’ is a very big thing for the Techno-mind cult. But ‘DNA’ is much more than what we understand when we blithely throw the acronym about in our intelligent conversations.
Presumably, the genetic code with which techno-science plays its tricks is only the minute fraction of our total ‘DNA’ that codes for identifiable pathways - which, as we know all too well, is already enough for those games to cause havoc. But the vastest part of our ‘DNA’ is a largely mysterious realm. Long labelled ‘junk’ since it seemed to do nothing measurably useful, elements of it have recently been given scientific names such as ‘introns’ and ‘transposons’. Based on animal experimentation (animals too have this ‘junk’), these elements appear to have some pretty important high-level roles as managers of the components of coding DNA - roles characterized by words like ‘regulating’, ‘influencing’, ‘controlling’, ‘modulating’, ‘repairing’. Such terms should give us pause as we contemplate the nature of ‘DNA’.
Rather than buying into the reductive idea of a ‘god gene’ (a gene to run our cosmic spirituality?!? And only one gene?!?), we might wonder whether much of the ‘junk’ that ‘does nothing useful’ is related largely to the subtle dimensions of who we are, for expression in this life. In this sense, and in view of its reputedly high-level functions, perhaps much of it resides beyond the reach of even quantum-level technologies. Beyond the reach of the Techno-mind god?
But Yuval Harari has firmly stated that humans are now ‘hackable’. As if nothing in our ‘DNA’ were beyond reach. So let us wonder (speculatively): might the ‘junk’ be a treasure that the Techno-cult aims to either hijack or cancel out, indirectly, by gene-tricking what it can within the coding portion of human DNA, as is already done to our animal ‘cousins’? And as is already done by stealth to humans surreptitiously modified by frankenfoods, environmental poisoning, human tissue-derived ‘additives’ in soft drinks, ‘medical’ hacking tricks, and so on…
With these considerations in mind, you might want to watch the video again (as did I), in case your first viewing didn’t shake you to the core.
EctoLife - the sick love of the godtrix for… the matrix!
No. Period.